Enter our December 2007 Giveaway! We're giving away 14 prizes worth several hundred bucks! Enter HERE.

Statistics

Visitors: 925907

Advertisement

Notebook Computers
For the best deals on laptop computers visit www.Geeks.com.


Kingston HyperX Ultra Low Latency PC3200 PDF Print E-mail
Written by Mikhail Ivanenkov   
Wednesday, 20 June 2007

I did some comparison testing using the HyperX RAM in single and dual pairs (1GB and 2GB respectively) to see what kind of impact more memory would have on overall bandwidth. I also compared it to a pair of Kingston PC3200 ValueRAM sticks to see what kind of a difference the timings would make (HyperX runs at 2-2-2-5 whereas the ValueRAM operates at 2.5-3-3-8). Every stick is 512MB so there's no difference in density between the various pieces.

Installation is simple and there's enough clearance between the memory sticks and the heat spreaders for non-contact placement. The test system specs are:
  • Intel Pentium 4 2.4C @ 2.4GHz - 2.8GHz (12 x 200 - 235MHz)
  • Abit IS7-E i865-PE
  • 1GB (2 x 512MB) Kingston PC3200 ValueRAM
  • 2GB (4 x 512MB) Kingston PC3200 UL HyperX
  • Hercules GeForce3
  • Onboard audio and LAN
  • Maxtor DiamondMax 9 Plus 160GB HDD
  • Creative 32X CD-ROM
  • Antec Phantom 350watt PSU
The programs used for testing include SuperPI, Cachemem, PCMark04 (memory test suite), and Sandra 2005 (memory bandwidth benchmark). Voltage was tracked using Motherboard Monitor 5.3.7. Stability was tested using both Prime95's Torture Test (the Blend test which utilizes about 1.6GB of RAM) and Sandra's Burn-In Wizard (looping memory bandwidth benchmarks with 50% max CPU utilization). The Kingston ValueRAM was left at its stock speed of PC3200 (DDR400) with the default 2.5-3-3-8 timings. This is a good representation of mainstream or budget-oriented memory. Besides, as we saw in the ValueRAM review it barely overclocks anyway. Keep in mind that overclocking voids your warranty, so do so at your own risk.

The HyperX was fun though. At the stock settings of PC3200 (DDR400) the SPD defaulted to 2.5-2-2-5 timings. Apparently this is typical of Samsung TCCD modules so you'll need to manually set it to 2-2-2-5 in the BIOS. From there I went up in 5MHz increments until there was instability at 210MHz. I then upped the voltage from 2.5V to 2.6V (the recommended). Still unstable. I then went up to 2.7V and finally to 2.8V (the highest my motherboard can go), at which point the system would continue to lock up. A slight bump down to 209MHz was stable at 2-2-2-5 and 2.8V. I tried setting it to 215MHz just for fun but before the power-on tests even came up I got an error saying neither my keyboard nor my mouse could be detected.

I then had to loosen the timings. An interesting note: certain timing combinations just don't work, even if they are looser. It really depends on the memory being used and the rest of the system configuration. For example, I couldn't get past 215MHz using 2.5-3-3-6 or even 2.5-3-3-7, but 2-3-3-6 worked perfectly (from here on down I had the voltage set to 2.8V). At the latter setting I went up 5MHz at a time until I topped out at 240MHz which was the first time the computer crashed. I then increased the CPU voltage slightly and used a higher quality PSU. This caused the instability to be less noticeable (I would get random errors but the OS still ran), so the final highest stable overclock I was able to reach was 235MHz at 2-3-3-6 and 2.8V (actually 2.75V according to Motherboard Monitor).

Something else to keep in mind is that I'm using one particular configuration. Some sites that reviewed the same memory had better luck (even reaching DDR500 and higher) while others were in the same boat if not worse. What kind of performance boost you'll be able to squeeze out depends on the actual chips you get (luck of the draw) and the type of other hardware you're running. So, for testing I'll be comparing the ValueRAM, HyperX at default, HyperX maximum stable overclock at 2-2-2-5 (209MHz effectively DDR418), and HyperX maximum stable overclock at 2.5-3-3-6 (235MHz effectively DDR470). The labeling method on the graphs is as follows:
  • KVR200-1G - Kingston ValueRAM 1GB (2 x 512MB) @ DDR400 (200MHz), 2.5-3-3-8
  • KHX200-1G - Kingston HyperX 1GB (2x 512MB) @ DDR400 (200MHz), 2-2-2-5
  • KHX200-2G - Kingston HyperX 2GB (4x 512MB) @ DDR400 (200MHz), 2-2-2-5
  • KHX209-1G - Kingston HyperX 1GB (2x 512MB) @ DDR418 (209MHz), 2-2-2-5
  • KHX209-2G - Kingston HyperX 2GB (4x 512MB) @ DDR418 (209MHz), 2-2-2-5
  • KHX235-1G - Kingston HyperX 1GB (2x 512MB) @ DDR470 (235MHz), 2-3-3-6
  • KHX235-2G - Kingston HyperX 2GB (4x 512MB) @ DDR470 (235MHz), 2-3-3-6
Throughout the graphs I've highlighted the most extreme values, i.e. the slowest ValueRAM at 200MHz 2.5-3-3-8 and the fastest HyperX at 235MHz 2-3-3-6. First up is SuperPI which calculates pi to x digits, in this case 1 million, 2 million, and 4 million.

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 20 June 2007 )
 

Poll

What will be your next upgrade?
 

Forum

Thread: still here
Starter: Mikhail
359 Views
1 Replies
Last Post: schembo2000 »

Thread: Mozilla's Minefield.
Starter: moon111
277 Views
1 Replies
Last Post: CoolZone »

Thread: Automobiles to go Open-source ???
Starter: moon111
285 Views
1 Replies
Last Post: Exan »

Thread: Huge LAN Party In Jan. 10th-11th, 2009, Ventura,CA
Starter: peti1212
366 Views
0 Replies
Last Post: peti1212 »

Thread: U.S. Election
Starter: moon111
313 Views
1 Replies
Last Post: Exan »

Thread: online pharmacy-viagra 1$ yes !!!
Starter: #mirunga123
1 Views
0 Replies
Last Post: #mirunga123 »

Thread: The Joke Thread
Starter: schembo2000
1,354 Views
11 Replies
Last Post: Exan »

Thread: help me please! windows 98 - dont know...
Starter: FaTMollY
11 Views
0 Replies
Last Post: FaTMollY »

Thread: Oil-Immersion Cooling Goes Mainstream
Starter: moon111
399 Views
1 Replies
Last Post: schembo2000 »

Thread: young boys having gay sex video
Starter: LuisseRaysson
4 Views
0 Replies
Last Post: LuisseRaysson »

Mikhail
5,809 Posts

Exan
5,250 Posts

Cloud Strife
3,557 Posts

Altron
2,963 Posts

johan851
2,931 Posts